Know what the payer owed.
Prove what came back.
Most platforms tell a revenue-cycle team that something is wrong. Revitics reconstructs the financial life of every claim — what was billed, what the payer said, what the contract required, and whether the money actually arrived.
Priced from a human-verified contract term, matched to a supplemental remittance. Synthetic figures from the demonstration environment.
What the analysis says is wrong.
What a person reviewed and accepted.
What left the building, byte-for-byte retained.
Matched to a remittance above the payment level at submission.
Four numbers, kept apart on purpose. Collapsing them is how a board hears “we found $8.7M” and a controller finds $2.4M in the bank.
For every service delivered, can you say what happened financially — and show why any of it is wrong?
Expected-versus-actual reimbursement is a mature category. The difference is whether a finding can survive being questioned.
What actually happened
Claims, corrections, acknowledgments, payments, denials, takebacks and appeals, kept as a history rather than overwritten into a balance.
What should have happened
Reimbursement calculated from human-verified contract terms by a deterministic engine. No model produces a dollar figure.
Why we say money is owed
Every finding carries the claim line, the payer's own adjustment codes and the contract term it rests on — assembled into the package that gets sent.
The financial life of a single claim
Every stage is a record, not a status field. This is what a specialist sees before deciding whether an appeal is worth making.
Designed for the review a hospital will actually run
No black-box money
AI extracts, classifies, summarizes and drafts. It never determines an amount. Every calculation stores its inputs, the contract version and the engine version, so a figure can be re-derived years later.
Refuses rather than guesses
Where no verified contract term applies, the platform returns expected payment unavailable instead of inventing a rate. An appeal missing a required fact says so rather than filling the gap.
Evidence a payer can check
Packages enclose the claim as billed, the payer's own adjudication, the arithmetic and the contract term — and state plainly what is not enclosed.
Tenant isolation, tested
Every tenant-scoped resource is enforced server-side, and the boundary is covered by automated tests rather than asserted in a questionnaire.
Two products, one engineering discipline
Both multi-tenant, both white-label capable, both built so a customer can see exactly where a number came from.
Revenue Intelligence & Recovery
What was billed, what was paid, what should have been paid under the contract, why the difference exists, what evidence proves it, and whether the money came back.
→People Platform
The employment lifecycle on one backend and one identity — careers site, applicant tracking, offers, onboarding and employee self-service.
A scoped historical assessment, against your own data
No EHR integration required to begin. You supply 837 and 835 files and your payer contracts; we return findings you can audit line by line.
Secure data transfer
Historical claims, remittances and contracts, moved under a signed agreement.
Deterministic analysis
Expected reimbursement from your verified terms; underpayments, denials, zero-balance exposure and takebacks separated rather than pooled.
Findings you can audit
Every number traceable to a claim line, an adjustment code and a contract term — including what could not be computed, and why.
Your decision
Pursue the findings with your own team, with an RCM partner, or not at all. The assessment is yours either way.